I just finished reading Lidia Yuknavitch's memoir, The Chronology
of Water. My 15-year-old son
asked me what it was about, and I began with, “It's about this
woman who was sexually abused by her father as a kid, and her mother
was an alcoholic --” only to have him cut me off with a wave of the
hand, “Yeah, yeah, they're all like that. And then the kid grows up
to either become a drug addict, at least until they get religion and
clean up their act, or they end up in a psychiatric hospital, or they
become an artist or something.”
What could I say in response but,
“Um, yeah, kind of all of the above – except, in this particular
case, the bit about a religious conversion.”
I'm not sure there's a memoir out
there that isn't a cliché. The bildungsroman follows familiar
contours: there are only so many ways of growing up and becoming an
adult, ya know? The best we can do is tell the same old story
without telling it the same old way, which Yuknavitch certainly
accomplishes, with beautiful, scrape-your-eyeballs aplomb.
It isn't easy to write the real
stuff of our lives, though. No matter how many models are already out
there, writing memoir feels like a leap in the dark. It's a scary undertaking.
I suspect that people who've gone
through some kind of abuse or trauma or tragedy – and who therefore
have a marketable story – often struggle with the feeling that they
might be prostituting themselves, putting their pain on display for a
profit. It's empowering to turn something negative into something
positive, no doubt, but I'm guessing there's also something about
turning that kind of trick that just feels...ick. Why do I think
this? Because those of us without the skeleton of a cash cow in our
closets feel this way – it's just that we're not likely to be paid
as well for selling out.
The problem with writing memoir
is that truth-telling, for those of us who have basically healthy
relationships with the people in our lives, often feels like
betrayal.
I wasn't abused as a child. My
parents weren't alcoholics. I didn't have to deal with a debilitating
illness. There were no natural disasters in my immediate environment.
Nobody close to me died until I was in my 20's, with the exception of
a kid I sort of knew in high school who shot himself, a kid who had
as little to complain about as I did.
What do those of us who were
lucky, are lucky, and hope to stay lucky have to write about?
Plenty, actually. And it's not
always pretty.
Let me give you an example. In
the last essay I wrote, I included a little description of a distant
relative of mine – the brother of my step-great-grandmother, to be
exact – that didn't exactly put him in the most flattering light.
Judging by the way he dominated a conversation, he fancied himself a
commentator on the History Channel or something, and he was (to
paraphrase what I said in my essay) one of the least sexy men alive.
A nice man and a fine person, to be sure, but I used to look at him
and wonder how on earth he'd ever persuaded someone to marry him.
I had good reasons, artistically
speaking, for including this unflattering portrait of a man who is
mercifully no longer alive to feel slighted by what I said about him.
Sigh.
Sometimes I feel like I should
wait until everyone
I know is dead before assaying to write anything remotely memoir-ish.
Reminds me of a joke I once heard, about a couple in their 90's who
go to consult a lawyer about getting a divorce, and the astonished
attorney asks them, “Why now, after all these years together?”,
and they say, “We wanted to wait until the children were dead.”
I think a lot of writing, maybe most, is a form of exorcism. The writer wants to release something that has possessed him or her. Along the way some people choose to settle scores or earn points but regardless of the level of rage or pain that comes through, I don't think the primary, most essential motivation of the writer is blaming someone else, even if they think it is.
ReplyDeleteIsn't that what so much "fiction" is, though? Memoirs written with the names changed.
ReplyDelete