Saturday, July 28, 2012

Let's Try This Again

-->
I haven't written anything in almost 3 months.

Well, unless you count a few journal entries, the occasional email, three and a half pages of the first chapter of a Young Adult novel, and a short essay I had to submit as part of applying to the Independent Publishing Resource Center. (Those things don't count, but I still seem to be counting them, don't I?)

What I have been doing is reading a lot.

One of several books I've read during my writing hiatus -- Cheryl Strayed's Wild, which is the author's account of hiking 1,100 miles along the Pacific Crest Trail (what a coinkydink: I hiked 1,100 miles of the PCT, too!) -- led me back into my old journals.

What's striking to me is how many freakin' times I've come to the same conclusions about myself, and how, each time, as I'm recording the latest epiphany, it seems like new news to me.

Here's something from an undated entry (January 2010?) in a little red book:

"I want to say it, and have it feel right. That's what it is about writing: righting. Not wrongs or injustices. Just finding the balance, not capsizing in the waves of circumstance."

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Random


This afternoon, the best I could manage was, “I guess I'll take a (literal) walk and see if I end up in a different (metaphorical) place.”

I ended up at The Ugly Mug, a coffeeshop I've visited on only one other occasion, sipping a chai and flipping through the pages of the identity issue of Orlo: Exploring Environmental Issues through the Creative Arts.

I'd never seen or heard of this publication before. But it's been around for at least ten years, and it's staffed by at least a dozen people, and, like, it has art and essays and poems and advertisements and everything in it. In other words, it is a project that's being taken at least semi-seriously by at least several somebodies.

One of those somebodies framed his thoughts about the meaning of identity thusly: You are as good as the best thing you ever wrote.

I'm pretty sure that's an exact quote.

I'm also pretty sure that the best thing I ever wrote – not that I could tell you what that was, because I don't have a clue – wasn't all that good.

Which means, I guess, that there's room for improvement.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Beauty is Truth (but the Truth ain't Pretty)


As Keats famously said, “Beauty is truth, truth beauty: that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.”

But Keats was a guy, and he was only 26 when he died. If he'd been like me, a woman in her late 30's (I turn 38 this month! Ack!), I'm not sure he would have phrased the sum of all human knowledge in quite that way.

I'm not sure how I would phrase it, but I bet my version would be a little less poetic.

I'm on poem number 8 (out of a thousand), and there's not a beauty in the bunch. I seem to be in an ugly mood most of the time.

I keep feeling like I should write something pretty – like, for instance, an ode to spring's blossoming trees, whose flower petals fall and cover the sidewalks like exotic scented snowdrifts – but that's not where the juice is right now.

What I actually want to write, what I find myself actually writing, is self-indulgent crap about aging and anxiety, or pain and purposelessness. For example, here are the last few lines of poem #7: I inhabit / contingency, as if I were an old hotel / in a city sinking into the sea, / with all the guests making love / in derelict rooms / beneath my mossy chandeliers.

And that's as pretty as it gets, folks. I am seriously considering writing a poem about the dead raccoon I saw a few months ago, the one with the swarming face.

Maggots are the antithesis of poetry, right?

Hmmmm.

I'm reminded of a Japanese “death poem” by Kyoriku:

'Til now I thought
that death befell
the untalented alone.
If those with talent, too
must die
surely they make
a better manure?

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Not to Scale

Since my "I'm gonna write 1,000 poems" decision, I've written 5 poems. Not bad, I guess. I've got a 3-day car trip ahead of me, so I hope to write a few more -- hopefully, they won't all be about the existential loneliness of the open highway.

Actually, I do have a poem in mind: the past few days, I've been thinking about how we human beings actually have a very poor perception of scale. How big is the universe? How small is an atom? How big is that problem that's getting all of my attention, and how small is it in comparison to what's really important to me?

What's a big deal, and what is not? Sometimes there's a lot of meaning in a seemingly small gesture.

The poem, if I write it, will be called "Not to Scale."

Meanwhile, I leave you with a quote by Shigenori Kameoka (whoever s/he might be), which was shared with my by a dear friend of mine: "Find the seed at the bottom of your heart and bring forth a flower."




Tuesday, March 13, 2012

A Thousand Poems


Yesterday, I decided to write a thousand poems. Yes, I know: it's going to take me three or four years, at least. And it's highly likely that not a single poem turns out to be really good. No matter. I'm going to do it anyway, because I believe that doing it a thousand times anyway will end up counting for something.

It turns out that, not counting activities related to my immediate survival (e.g., taking a breath) or my personal hygiene (e.g., taking a shower), there are actually very few things I've done a thousand times.

Here's the list I've come up with:

*cooked dinner
*done a load of laundry
*gone grocery shopping
*nursed each of my children
*read a bedtime story aloud
*hiked a mile
*had sex
*sung a song
*sent an email
*phoned a friend
*written a journal entry
*graded a student's paper

I don't know how long a person has to do something before it becomes part of her identity – “I am” rather than “I do” – but I've always wanted to be a poet, and writing a thousand poems seems as good a way as any to get started on becoming one.

No, I'm not going to post every poem I write. But since today's is the first of the thousand (not to be confused with one-in-a-thousand), it marks something of an occasion. So here it is, such as it is:

#1

Called to account, I'm counting
everything this morning,
making chalk marks on my wall,
leaving traces: two pieces of toast,
two kumquats, a single
porcelain cup full of black tea,
and all those words I worry
I won't have said.

Not just what my daughter,
four years and three months,
brought home in a plastic bag
(three red camellias, three wet stones,
two silver slippers, six brown buds,
and a slug) but also
all those wishes in the rushes,
unnamed, and thus uncounted.

Hurry, quick: slalom and zipper,
halcyon and cyan (five lemons
on a blue plate – can you see it?)
yes and chit and chop, and choreograph,
lined up alongside blister, bluster, blather,
and also blah blah blah, which is to say:
I was here, and here, and here.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Dream Poems


A few nights ago, I dreamed I was with my husband in a concrete house that was suspended, foundation and all, in the air. We seemed to be moving slowly over a body of water. Rather suddenly, the whole thing tipped, like the Tower of Pisa, and angled into the water; soon, we were submerged. My husband said to me, “Watch out!” – and I realized that I was in danger of being pinned under the weight of the sinking house. I managed to follow him out from under the house, and we swam to shore. In my hand was a key, but it was just an outside key, not an inside key. All my writing – journals, poems, essays, everything – was in a sealed box inside the house at the bottom of the ocean. I no longer had access to any of it. I was really upset by this: why hadn't I found other places to house my thoughts?

I was reminded of a series of thematically related dreams I had several years ago.

In the spring of 2007, my writing practice was to record my dreams immediately upon waking and then, later that morning, to turn at least one dream into a poem. After a couple of weeks of this, I started to notice that my dreams were changing: more and more, they were about the creative process.

Here are two dream poems from that time:

Verisimilitude

The author has his wares displayed
at Page 101, a little art gallery downtown
that's set up like an illustrated encyclopedia.
Most of his characters are life-sized men
of monochrome maché doing chest presses
with cardboard dumbbells painted to match,
too big for my house, but I could consider
the smaller, craftier things for sale in the back,
like ceramic toothbrushes and a flower vase
sculpted to look like a train engine, very pink.
What really captivates me is a plate
decorated with red and yellow pear tomatoes
and pea pods so green I want to eat them
even though they're fake -- and look,
see that pile of peas and unshelled peanuts
on the shelf, scattered, come unglued?
The author must have intended this mess
to be a mirror for entropy in the world.
Because I have always longed to own
my very own metaphor, I check its price
and discover that what I have picked up
is an actual peanut, actually just half
an empty husk, those familiar ridges
on the brown outside, and on the flipside,
formerly an inside, those scooped hollows,
each the right size for the tip of my tongue,
and each equally worthless to me
because there is no round-trip ticket
from what's imagined to what's real.


The Critique
Whenever other people's psyches are up for sale
I love to take the tour, trying on every room
for size, savoring the delicious pretense
that I could afford their marble, gilt, and plush.

Your place is lower-budget than most,
all low-ceilinged hallways and musty closets.
I don't want to spend even one night here,
but I follow along as you push open each door
and flip light switches on and off, to no avail.

And then you're gone, and whatever sleeps
under your washing machine comes slithering out.
I'm looking right at it, but all I can see for sure
are the stripes, black and white, writhing:
no snake skin or rat tail or tarantula leg
could match this clown kachina black and white,
this cheap costume stocking stripe, unwinding
on the floor in front of me while I stand
paralyzed, backed up against your flimsy wall.

I can only breathe in, and in, and in again.
I'm choking on my own voice, swallowing
each forsaken thought as if it were a balloon
I could only inflate by speaking it aloud --

And when I escape from here, the sentence
I pull out of my mouth will be a perfect copy
of the unknown creature coiled in your hallway,
each word a stripe, each space a stripe,
this pattern that means precisely nothing
until you tell me how it strikes you.


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Hallmark Guerrilla: A Writing Exercise


This morning, someone in my household (hint: his name rhymes with Schmyler) came up with the brilliant idea of going through a bunch of document boxes to see if there was anything in them that could be tossed. So I spent a couple of hours going through old correspondence (yeah, I grew up in the days when the USPS occasionally delivered something other than the Tuesday Penny Saver), and then, in a sudden frenzy of “I need to throw something away NOW, or I will have wasted my entire morning!” decided to chuck several folders full of teaching materials.

There's one writing exercise I decided I needed to save in electronic form. It's something I used in the poetry writing class I taught back in – what, 2005? I'd totally forgotten about it, so it was kind of fun to encounter it again.

Here's how it works:

  1. Each person brings to class the schmaltziest Hallmark love poem they can find. (It isn't necessary to actually buy the card – it's fine to simply copy the text. Yes, anyone who wanders down the greeting card aisle will look at you askance, but at least you won't be “voting” for bad poetry with your hard-earned dollars.)
  2. Each person reads his/her candidate aloud to the rest of the class, followed by a brief explanation of what made the poem schmaltzy.
  3. Mock writing workshop: identify what's not working in the poems, and come up with suggestions for improvement. (Sorry, all you Hallmark poets out there: I know this is like being tried in absentia....)
  4. Class discussion: What common problems did we observe? How do we avoid making those kinds of mistakes in our own poetry?

I'll copy two examples here:

I. Sometimes I wish
you and I had just met
And we had a whole lifetime
ahead of us yet
It's fun to imagine us
starting brand-new
with so many wonderful
things we could do.
And maybe this time
we'd avoid some mistakes
Or manage to catch
a few luckier breaks
But you know, I just can't
imagine a way
We'd be happier, ever,
than we are today.

II. I love you
I love your eyes
I love your smile
I love the way you eat spaghetti
I love the way you kiss
I love the way you look at me
I love the way you spoil me
I love your walk
I love it when you act silly
I love the way you look when you wake up
I love the way you love me...
And that's just the beginning.

The first poem sounds like Dr. Seuss wrote it: there's that sing-songy anapest, the predictable end-rhyme – catchy enough, but pretty silly sounding. What would happen if it were written in a different meter, with a different rhyme scheme, or no rhymes at all?

The second poem might as well be titled, “One Love Fits All” – it's just a catalog of generalizations. What if each line were made much more specific, even absurd? (e.g., I love the way you eat spaghetti / With your fork between your toes)?





Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Review of Twyla Tharp's The Creative Habit


Twyla Tharp (yes, the choreographer – how many Twyla Tharps could there possibly be?) begins the second chapter of her book The Creative Habit: Learn It and Use It for Life with the following revelation:

“I begin each day of my life with a ritual: I wake up at 5:30 a.m., put on my workout clothes, my leg warmers, my sweatshirts, and my hat. I walk outside my Manhattan home, hail a taxi, and thell the driver to take me to the Pumping Iron gym at 91st Street and First Avenue, where I work out for two hours.”

Dude.

I mean, seriously: 5:30 a.m.? Two hours? Every day? How am I supposed to take this woman's advice about anything, given that she's obviously made of different stuff than I am?

To make matters worse, there's this gem, from her last chapter: “When I look back on my best work, it was inevitably created in what I call The Bubble. I eliminated every distraction, sacrificed almost everything that gave me pleasure, placed myself in a single-minded isolation chamber, and structured my life so that everything was not only feeding the work but subordinated to it. It is not a particularly sociable way to operate. It's actively anti-social. On the other hand, it is pro-creative.”

A paragraph like that is confirmation of my worst fears. Well, okay, not my worst fears. Still, I find it discouraging to think I've got to make Tharp's pact with Devil Discipline if I want to have a hope of creating anything worthwhile. (What next? Burnt offerings? Every last guest at my would-be dinner party? Awww, really? Do I hafta?)

As you can see, I read the whole book through a haze of suspicion, looking for reasons to discount what Tharp had to say about developing the creative habit. So maybe it's no surprise that my favorite passages were those that seemed to contradict her more characteristic “singleness of purpose” through-line.

I particularly liked what she had to say about luck: “Habitually creative people are, in E.B. White's phrase, 'prepared to be lucky.' The key words here are 'prepared' and 'lucky.' They're inseparable. You don't get lucky without preparation, and there's no sense in being prepared if you're not open to the possibility of a glorious accident.”

Later, she suggests that being generous is the surest route to luck in the creative arena, because, “If you're generous to someone...you are in effect making him lucky. This is important. It's like inviting yourself to a community of good fortune.” The most fortunate people Tharp knows, she says, have a few characteristics in common: they are prepared, they work hard, they're alert, they involve others in their work, and “they tend to make others feel lucky to be around them.”

Hmmm. I don't know about you, but these ruminations on the importance of community and collaboration don't jive (is it “jive” or “jibe”?) with her claim that spending extended periods of time in The Bubble is probably a necessary evil for those of us who want to create.

So...here's to many more dinner parties, chez moi. Cheers!

Friday, February 17, 2012

The Fine Art of Noticing


A couple of nights ago, I saw a raccoon cross the road, hurrying to get out of the way of the approaching car. A couple of nights before that, it was an opossum that my headlights had picked out. At first, I'd thought it was a large, ugly cat – and then I noticed the pointy snout and the long pink tail.

The noteworthy (beautiful, strange, idiosyncratic, ironic, thematic, defining) details of our lives often appear suddenly and disappear just as quickly. As writers, it's our job to be open to them – and sometimes, it's our job to record them, even if we're not quite sure why.

Here are a few of the things I noticed today:

*A group of several tiny birds, greenish-yellow, with white chevrons at the tips of their wings, busily picking at rust-colored catkins in the birch tree outside my bedroom window.

*The way a downtown newspaper vendor held out both of his arms to test for rain – a gesture that reminded me of religious statuary – before pulling the hood of his parka over his head.

*Branches curving up like candelabra, strung and studded with raindrops.

*The first open daffodils.

*A menagerie of plastic dinosaurs placed among the rocks and ferns of a front yard landscape.

*The feral look in a stranger's eyes right before he passed me on the sidewalk: “Slutwhore,” he said, aiming the comment straight at my face.

*That clover honey doesn't taste like mesquite honey, even mixed into tea and milk.

*Strata of memories and associations attached to a specific song (in this case, Coldplay's “The Scientist”): within 20 seconds of hearing the opening notes, I was in tears, even though I had been feeling really happy only minutes earlier.

What are some of the things you've noticed today?

Thursday, January 26, 2012

What I Read in 2011


My sister-in-law Kate recently posted a list of all the books she read in 2011 on her blog, and I was blown away: I think I counted 57. None of which I'd read, although there is a copy of Blindness on my shelf and I have been intending to read it for...oh, the last five years or so, in case that counts.

My list is much shorter. Here, in roughly chronological order, are the books I read in 2011:

Fanny Hill
Just Kids
The Glass House
Vox
The Bride Stripped Bare
Foolsgold
Jealousy: The Other Life of Catherine M.
Lit
Bliss:Writing to Find Your True Self
The Other Side of Desire
Writing From the Heart
Sex at Dawn
The War of Art
Creative Is a Verb
Ordinary Genius
The Chronology of Water
A Billion Wicked Thoughts
Bonk
High Fidelity

Nineteen books. A third of the number Kate read. Not that I'm competitive or anything.

Oh, have I mentioned that in 2011, she also found a literary agent, had a play produced, wrote the first draft of a YA novel for the NaNoWriMo competition, and made (and sold) a bunch of her new whimsical bird/people sculptures?

So I was surprised when Kate recently wrote me an email asking if I wanted to be her “writing buddy.” Her idea was that we'd send each other pages every week – not for feedback, exactly, just as a way of checking in. It seems to me that Kate is doing just fine on her own, and that I'm the one who could really benefit from some hand-holding – but hey, I'm not going to argue with her about who is likely to get more out of this deal. Sign me up, I told her.


Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Still Life of a Dilettante Dabbling in Self-Discipline


My writing goals for 2012 are to:
*work 6 hours/week on a larger project
*do 3 half-hour freewrites each week
*write & post 2 blog entries each week
*every week, write & send 1 letter, preferably snail-mail

It's only a couple of weeks into January, and already I'm not doing so hot. Yes, I'm a little closer to meeting my weekly writing quotas than I am to meeting my weekly exercise quotas (my goal of doing 25 sit ups and 25 push ups at least 5 days a week has prompted me to do exactly ZERO sit ups and ZERO push ups this month), but even so: I've hardly hit the ground running.

Aimlessly ambling, maybe. Plodding, pointlessly pigeon-toed.

Shuffling.

Oozing.

Ugh! Hang on just a sec, while I attend RIGHT NOW to those overdue sit ups and push ups....

OK. I'm back at the keyboard – shakier, but on firmer ground.

Now, about those writing goals. Despite my poor showing thus far, I really think I can manage the letter, the freewrites, and the blog entries every week – at least more often than not. It's really just a question of finding (pardon me: making) the time and remembering to make good use of it.

My big concern is that bit about working 6 hours a week on some unspecified larger project.

I have an idea for a book, but it scares the bejeezus out of me – which seems to suggest the requisite probability of becoming obsessed, if I can only get myself to begin.

I've had this book in mind for...oh, probably at least five years now. I've taken a few stabs at it in the past: I have an outline, a bunch of notes, and even a series of short essays in which I began exploring my topic in more detail.

An old high school friend of mine recently read some of those essays. “I hope you're going to write a book,” he told me on the phone last week.

“I know, I know,” I said, “But I just don't know, you know? I mean, who am I writing it for?”

“You're writing it for people like me,” he said. Simple as that.

One excuse down, a gazillion to go....

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

The (Young) Writers Group: To Join or Not to Join?


Way back when, I was in a writers group with some friends of mine. This was before two of them went on to get their MFA's and one went on to become a successful writer (= her books make enough money for her to support her family on royalties) and I went on to become...someone who has yet to become anything in particular.

Inspired by the knowledge that we were in for some serious razzing if we were to show up at a meeting with nothing to share, each of us wrote more prolifically than we otherwise would have, and – if I do say so – some of it was halfway decent. We were all English majors, well versed in textual analysis, and I think we batted around some good ideas during feedback sessions, too.

But I am pretty sure I'm speaking for all of us when I say that what we did in our group meetings did very little, if anything, to improve the quality of our writing.

Writers groups are useful if what you want is an excuse to socialize with people who are going to know what you mean when you say you're having trouble with your hook (hint: it has nothing to do with tennis elbow). Writers groups are great for providing a sense of solidarity. And they're a needed kick in the pants for those of us who tend to drift off the page & into reveries about the epic novel cycle we're going to write – just as soon as we win the lottery and buy that adorable writing retreat in the Adirondacks.

In other words, I guess writers groups aren't a complete waste of time.

Which is one reason why I recently accepted an invitation to join – or at least check out – a local writers group. The other reason is that, being new to Portland, I'm not above joining such a group just on the off chance that I might make some new friends that way.

I had no idea what to expect, since I was acquainted (barely!) with only one member of the group, and had never so much as laid eyes on anyone else in it.

On Sunday evening, I was let into a stranger's living room and introduced around. The other writers were friendly, bright, articulate, and hip. They were also...kids.

I'm 37. Not old, in other words. But I felt simply ancient in comparison to the other writers assembled in that living room. I'm guessing that only one of them had even hit 30, and as it happens, that one still lives with his mother. With my 18-year marriage and my two kids, not to mention my many years of freelance editing and teaching composition, I was automatically accorded a certain respect: hey, I might be a random from off the streets, but I obviously spoke with the Voice of Experience.

It was hard not to feel like I was back in the classroom.

Maybe that's why I felt compelled to point out the dangling modifiers in two of their manuscripts.

Oddly, despite my behaving like an insufferable know-it-all, when it came time to say our good-byes, I got several enthusiastic hugs and comments to the effect that I'd been very helpful. Apparently, I will be welcomed back if I decide I want to join their future gatherings.

Aye, there's the rub: do I really want to be Den Mother for the (Young) Writers Group on a regular basis?

Saturday, January 7, 2012

What Are Real Writers Wearing This Season?

I want roses on my head: silver tissue roses, watered silk roses, roses made of pixels and memory -- and real roses, too: tea rose scented, spicy, musky, wildflowery, hint of apricot, hint of snow. 
 
I want a crown, a dragon with a ridged back made of Indian arrowheads, its claws reaching down onto my forehead, each tipped with a ruby, its dragony tail in its mouth, completing the circle.

I want a wand tipped with a star that is also a heart that is also a giant bubble perpetually on the point of bursting.

I want ruby slippers. I want striped tights. I want a sea-foam tutu that flounces and glitters, and a cape of white peacock feathers. I want a satin corset that laces up the back, black, with understated trim the color of raspberry parfait. I want a sash of jingling coins and cowrie shells, strung together with spider silk and cranberries. I want diamond chain mail, and anklets with platinum spikes, and, snaking up the backs of my calves and thighs, henna vines with blooms revealing, at their center, eyes that open and close. 
 
I want to be holding a big green bowl of bright yellow lemons. 
 
I want a barn owl on my left shoulder, and a clever blue parrot on my right, and a hawk with a raven's soul perched on my wrist. 
 
I want a rain check and a magic mop. 
 
I want the whole show, me myself and I, and everything we imply, projected onto, into, nature: a dark volcanic island close to the mainland, but separated from it by channels of sluicing water, ice slush atop every wave and rainbows in the spray, and, right in the middle of the island, a round pool fed by hot springs, and everywhere the softest moss and the sharpest evergreens and the chill clear sky of possibility.

Never mind that all of this would be too much, would look ridiculous if it were possible to achieve, which it isn't; never mind that I would collapse under all that weight. 
 
At the heart of it: exuberance and greed. Wanting it both ways, wanting it all ways. Wanting.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

New Year's Statement of Purpose


I like my New Year's resolutions served with a twist. I've come up with quite a few variations over the years. Back when I was the Event Planner for my co-housing community, I dreamed up a NYE activity that involved getting everyone at the party to write a resolution on a slip of paper, after which all the slips of paper were collected and put into a hat (or maybe it was a mixing bowl?). Then everyone took turns drawing a resolution – which had, in all likelihood, been penned by someone else.

I will never forget the look on my neighbor Carl's face when he unfolded the little slip of paper he had just drawn from the hat (bowl?) and read aloud, “Have more multiple orgasms.” Know this: if you look up “curmudgeon” in the dictionary, you're gonna see a picture of Carl. He gave a little snort. Then he held up his hand as if he were being solemnly sworn in before before the Grand Erotic Court, gruffly pledging to us all, “Hey – I'll do my best!”

This year, the plan was to come up with a statement of purpose rather than a list of resolutions. I borrowed the idea from a presenter at the IEA conference I attended in 2010. Flemming Christensen was a soft-spoken Dane with bold notions, one of which was that a personal statement of purpose (as in, “What is my purpose in life?”) should be phrased in such a way that it takes into account your natural strengths, is clearly in line with your values & beliefs, and points to a few specific focus areas. Naturally, composing such a statement is no simple matter, so he developed the following brainstorming exercise:

Complete the following statements:

  1. I am a _____, a _____, and a ______.
  2. I am dedicated to _____________.
  3. My ambitions are to ___________.
  4. The work I take on myself is to ___________.

Back in 2010, I took a crack at filling in those blanks, and here's what I came up with:

  1. I am a doer, a connoisseur, and a teacher.
  2. I am dedicated to improving my understanding of myself and others.
  3. My ambitions are to enjoy & accept myself and others.
  4. The work that I take on myself is to let go without giving up.

This time around, everyone in the small group gathered around my dining room table took 10 minutes to come up with a long list for #1, and then we solicited others' opinions on which descriptors we ought to adopt. My longer list was eventually winnowed down to confidante, frog catcher, tale-teller, unfolding fern, lover, and soul gardener, all of which I stand by, but I eventually went with a slightly different list for #1.

Here's my 2012 version, in rough outline:

  1. I am a lover, a catalytic confidante, and a wordwanderer.
  2. I am dedicated to exploration and expansion (a.k.a. “personal growth”).
  3. My ambition is to learn how to BALANCE – naturally, without effort.
  4. The work I take on myself is to teach others how to free themselves into creativity (or, as my friend Dave rephrased it, to inspire others to “buy locally” – i.e., from their own brains...).

Good luck with all that, eh?

I may end up making a list of regular ol' resolutions, too – one of which probably ought to be, “Finish putting together my 2012 Statement of Purpose”!