Sunday, July 31, 2011

Business Memos & Cultured Pearls


This is the third evening in a row that I have intended to write an entry in which I neatly weave together some thoughts on my last post (“Invitation” – a prose poem that I wrote back in the spring of 2008 that seems almost surreally relevant both to this blog and to what's going on in my life at the moment), the story of how I became interested in narrative therapy (which, cleverly, would also serve as an introduction to what narrative therapy even IS, since most people haven't heard of it), and an actual exercise designed to help resolve interpersonal conflict, or at least to approach it differently.

In other words, I was going to wrap all the loose ends left by my previous posts into one tidy package, which I planned to tie with the glossy ribbon of an easy reconciliation with my critical spouse, who redeemed himself by doing some html hocus-pocus on my blog's photo banner -- which, I promise you, would have been a seriously scrambled Scramble without his help.

Except, as we've already established, nothing saps my creative juice like organization. Or...gan...ize...A...shun....

Nights one and two ended with me just giving up & going to bed. Tonight, I'm toughing it out – at least long enough to get the business out of the way.

We'll consider this post's first paragraph a bookmark of sorts.

Additionally, I would like to point out that a really good strategy, if you want to discourage yourself from writing anything, is to go into Powell's bookstore and take a gander at the gazillions of books lined up on the shelves, like sardines or barnacles or some other small, ubiquitous marine creature -- most of which fishy, redolent goodness you will never get around to cracking open, not if you lived as long as the Ancient Mariner.

Then, if you are feeling especially masochistic, read Lit, Mary Karr's loaves n' fishes memoir, followed by some Rumi, and reflect upon all the ways in which you are like neither Karr nor Rumi.

Finally, write anyway. It doesn't matter whether or not your oyster is gonna make you a pearl.

...Love, / a little shell somewhere on the ocean / floor, opens its mouth. You and I / and we, those imaginary beings, enter / that shell as a single sip of seawater. --Rumi

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Invitation


  1. Who

You with that newspaper over your head, a peaked shuffle of damp pages, insufficient coverage: the whole world is leaking. You, drunk on everyday ills. You overboard. You with scorched fingers, melted tallow, a candle that can't be held to her. You the flattering lamplight. You, chink in the china, hairline fracture, tiny reminder of all the ways we won't fit together later. You the cudgel – do we have a pinata for you! You, scrambler for scrapple, bedraggled bird shedding crepe and candy; you, oblivious crowd. You, yes, yes, you too. You in your mangrove, your tower, your black cloud of bees. You, hero, mired, dressed in your stone habits; you, muckraker, drinking your bitters down. Poor you, lucky you, all of you.


  1. What

A celebration. A potlatch party, if you will. We'll get this monkey off the table: no more rinky-dinky chat, no more inky-kinky tit for tat. Come shine the silver plates and polish the best inscriptions, come pile them high, come burn the feast! Potato eyes. Brie bloom. Sausage casings. Shrimp veins. Cherry pits. Outsiders, insiders, all of us, toast: here's to lint, here's to dust, here's to hairballs in our drains!


  1. Where

On a picnic blanket in a ditch by the side of the road, near a junction far from everything but the shell of what might once have been a convenience store, lacquered in layers of graffiti and neglect. We can hear that old stop sign shimmying when the wind changes direction, bringing us the minty smell of rabbitbrush along with fine gold grit from the tops of distant mesas. It is a place so close to nowhere, we might as well be anywhere: in a cave accessed only at low tide, just a suggestion of surf surging through us; out on a limb in a forest of contradictions, canopy barely visible in coastal fog, the trunks below us charred by fires no one remembers; on top of a skyscraper, hundreds of stories above the one we have been telling ourselves, the one about how we've been here before, we recognize this place, it's that lot behind the amusement park where pigeons wheel in dirty flurries above the painted horses going round and round. We might as well be there. We might, as well, be here.


  1. When

Now, between time and time again, while we're wandering through this bazaar, not sure whether we're buying or selling. While merchants wink lasciviously at us, advertise their special. They will kill, carve out more, make neat bloodless packages we can open whenever we find ourselves hungry. Now, between overdue and underdone; now, before we're ready but after it's too late. Now, among bolts of fabric sparkling with live stars which, if we were to purchase a swath, would wink out, one by one, leaving us in the dark. We have come to accept this. Quality or quotidian, any time we might buy will turn out, eventually, to have been an illusion. These traders keep real time for themselves, skimming it from every transaction, each stashing away the excess until he has accumulated enough for a double life. Between one life and another, so the rumor goes, there is a time slot, a deep canyon of possibility – and this interim is what we want, this alone would be worth what we spend here.


  1. Why

Because fate may be determined, but she's also distracted: I can feel myself slipping through those callous fingers. Because, cast from the garden, I choose which reasons to grow in this springtime ditch by the side of whatever path we will cobble together from junk we find lying around. Because I choose your company, and choose to believe I choose what's been chosen. Because it's dark in the nick of time, and lonely.


  1. How

The way an uprooted gardener moves through his new garden, wondering which are weeds and which are native flowers; the way he feels a blister on his left palm with the fingers of his right, almost unconsciously, hesitating, then opens the back door of his new house and goes inside, where he does not yet belong. The way he turns on the tap and checks the water for rust before he drinks. The way he plans to go back outside, later, and walk these new streets under chipped stars, looking for the warmer lights of a neighborhood cafe or bar, some place that will be open late, where he will be welcomed as a newcomer and, after many years have passed, an old-timer. The way he'll take tonight: unfamiliar, overgrown with the as-yet-unknown. He will have to walk with his forearms up, protecting his face as if from the lash of eager saplings or exuberant nettles, he will have to push through and take care, he will have to notice what there is to notice, think to himself, look, there's a dogwood, a redbud, a coffeeberry, there's one of those strange night-blooming vines that remind me of the way I appear to myself in my mind's eye, surrounded by foliage and bits of blue glass. Such naming of sights is deliberate, though not without delight, the way a man lost in the wilderness of his own soul will set each rock and tree ablaze, burning to see his way more clearly.


Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Concerning Some Recent Criticism of Her Work (Part Two)


A lot of people who write self-help books for writers will advise you not to show your work to anyone in its early stages. You've got to get up some momentum, they warn, or you'll get discouraged before your project ever gets off the ground. Ask someone to read that rough draft of your first chapter, and chances are you'll never write another draft, let alone another chapter.

There's some wisdom in that advice. Who am I to argue with Anne Lamott (author of, among other titles, Bird by Bird, which was assigned in my undergraduate fiction writing class, years ago) or Julia Cameron (Grande Dame of self-help for blocked creative types, many of whom instantly become her disciples after reading The Artist's Way)?

However, it's advice I'm flagrantly disregarding – in the writing of this blog, at least.

Keeping my creative projects under wraps until I feel confident they're fit to be seen is a strategy that does NOT work for me. I never think anything I've written is fit to be seen – unless that “Woohoo! Look at me, I just crossed the finish line!” feeling is thrilling through me, and my vision's still pleasure-fogged. Let the poem or essay or pithy paragraph sit in the virtual drawer for even 24 hours, and the party's over: off with the rose-colored glasses, and on with the editor's monocle.

It's possible that this is an occupational hazard. For the past decade, I've been paid to fix other people's writing.

In any case, I've recently come to the conclusion that my best bet as a writer is to get my ideas out there before I have time to change my mind – or, in other words, to commit myself before I understand exactly what it is I've committed to. This may not be a good solution for everyone, but it's what I know I need to do.

Ergo, the blog.

Now, I have all kinds of reservations about push-button publishing, which I'll no doubt enumerate later. But one thing the blogosphere – as opposed to the bookstore or the library – has to offer a reader is this: a far more accurate picture of the process-to-product ratio.

When creative writing gurus advise you to keep those tender green shoots safe from the withering gaze of critical readers, the implication is that keeping your process private is the best way to ensure that your product develops into a kudzu vine robust enough to withstand whatever the eradication experts might think up next.

Well, I think anyone who wants to be creative needs to develop a more robust process. That's my quest, and I have a hunch that it will be successful.

To anyone who feels like tromping with me through the mud: I'm thrilled to have you along.

Concerning Some Recent Criticism of Her Work


Here is a somewhat condensed and (ironically!) reorganized version of what my husband had to say about why he didn't like my "Choose Your Own Adventure" post:

"My reaction to your first blog entry is that it seemed like an attention getter – and kept on being an attention-getter. So its primary purpose was to show off. It wasn't about what the reader might want or need. It was about you having fun with it. Except that your 'fun' seemed to be primarily about imagining the reader saying, 'Oh, this is clever!'. Well, I'm not impressed. I already know you can do the clever thing. What would really impress me is some kind of growth, you trying something new.

"I didn't like the cleverness because I think it served to cover up the fact that you really don't know what you're trying to say. Reading that first entry, the message I'm getting is that this blog is going to be a lot of disorganized information that will be a lot of hard work to figure out. I'm a lazy reader – if I'm going to read something, I want the author to do some work. You've got my attention, now persuade me that this is worth my while.

"I know that you are trying to be less audience-centered, that part of your point is that not all writing has to be the kind of organized writing I'm looking for – but that puts me in an awkward position. It's like I'm being told that you don't really give a fuck about me, the reader."

(Me: <writing it all down> Care if I quote you on this? Tyler: <slight laugh> No.)

***

Now, I have a long list of possible responses to Tyler “The Critic” Jarvik's somewhat valid but also hard-to-choke-down complaints, but as much as I love lists (Tyler: “Lists are the worst possible form of organization!”), I think I'd like to conclude this post with a pair of poems by Mark Doty:


Concerning Some Recent Criticism
of His Work

-----Glaze and shimmer,
luster and gleam;

can't he think of anything
but all that sheen?

-----No such thing,
the queen said,
as too many sequins.


Concerning Some Recent Criticism
of His Work

-----Glaze and shimmer,
luster and gleam...

-----What else to do
with what you adore

but build a replica?
My model theater's

an opera of atmospheres:
morning's sun-shot fog

hurried off the stage,
tidal gestures,

twilight's pour:
these gorgeous and
limited elements
which constitute

a universe, or verse
and if I love

my own coinage,
recombinant elements

(I know, lacquer
and tumble and glow,
burnished and fired

and hazed) it's because
what else Lord

to wear? Every sequin's
an act of praise.

These bright distillates
mirror the day's

glossed terms-----
what's the world but shine

and seem? She'd sewn
the wildly lavish thing
herself, and wore

-----forgive me!-----shimmer...

Monday, July 25, 2011

My Dirty Little Secret


Anyone who knows me will be utterly shocked by this confession, but I can't keep dissembling any longer. It's time for me to come out of the closet and peel off the mask. It's time to stop living a lie.

<deep breath...drumroll, please...>

Hello, one of my pseudonyms is Fauxy, which turns out not to be a very unique pseudonym, since according to my mother-in-law there are lots of other Fauxys out there in the blogosphere, but I digress, and that may be because I am trying to put off the moment of disclosure, which may be making some of you squirm, wondering just what horrendous monstrosity I'm planning to blurt, or on the other hand, it – 'it' meaning this tactic of delaying, by building up clauses – as I say, it may be because I am trying to illustrate, in a roundabout way, what I should really just come right out and say as succinctly as possible, so let's try this again:

Hello, my name is Tanya, and I AM A SCATTERBRAIN.

I know, I know: you are shocked and appalled. You are imagining secret stashes of clutter in my otherwise moderately clean house. You are envisioning double-booked events, missed deadlines and unpaid bills that I have somehow managed to conceal from everyone who might care about these things – and you're wondering how I've thus far managed to escape the consequences of my lifelong dalliance with chaos.

But I'm not talking about mere messiness, or even irresponsibility.

In many ways, I'm a pretty 'together' gal. My house, my social life, my work schedule, my finances – they're all in decent order. In fact, to many eyes, I probably look like a model of organization.

That's because I'm compensating.

It's actually my brain that's disorganized.

Which is why, if I want to make any sense out of the crazy mishmash of miscellany that's constantly doing the macarena in my head, I have to compose my thoughts – whether that means talking to a friend, writing in my journal, or even just imagining myself talking to a friend or writing in my journal.

As E.M. Forster famously put it, How can I tell what I think till I see what I say?

Sunday, July 24, 2011

A Pique Behind the Scenes


Usually, when you read something, you don't know much about the details of the writer's composition process. What was the writer wearing when she wrote the thing you're reading? (A somewhat scroungy purple bathrobe and rectangular glasses.) What time was it? (6:36 a.m.) What in god's name got her out of bed so early? (Yeah, yeah, you're thinking, get ON with it already! Show me the magic!)

Readers generally don't appreciate getting dragged into the bog of quotidian muck. Good writers know this, and they try to keep their prose clean.

However, this is a blog about the creative process. Which means I'm letting you, the reader, IN on my process, messy though it often is.

So please be warned: we are going to get our feet dirty.

Let's start off in a big ol' marital mudpuddle, shall we? What follows is the dialogue from a recent writing-related altercation between me and my husband, in two parts – one foot (schlupp) and then the other (squiiiish):

Misstep ONE

Me: (sigh) I miss having a reason to write. Ever since I finished [insert title of most recent project], I've been feeling... blah, like I'm adrift....

Him: Would you want to work on the multiplicity book?

Me: Yeah, actually, that sounded kind of appealing when we were talking about it the other day – but remember? You said you weren't sure about collaborating with me on that. You think I'm disorganized. My process annoys you.

Him: I wouldn't question it if you were successful at writing.

Me (flouncing out of the room and almost immediately marching back): Okay, I'm never dedicating a book to you. You are the most unsupportive person in the universe!

Misstep TWO

Me: Come here, come here – you have to read this!

Him: (reading my “Choose Your Own Adventure” blog entry, stone-faced)

Me: Wow. Way to crack a smile.

Him: (getting up from the computer & walking away)

Me: Well, I like it, so you can suck rocks!

Now, I've recounted this argument because I think it demonstrates several key things about both the creative process in general and the challenges I'm facing as I begin this particular process.

(It also demonstrates – let's be honest – that no matter how much we might think we've learned about effective communication, we are always capable of reverting to extremely childish behavior. Yes, each of us has a creative inner child, which is wonderful – as long as it's not tantrum time.)

Here's a list of some of the topics I came up with while I was sulking. Each will be discussed in greater detail later, in one or more future entries.

  1. Audience Awareness: What happens when you write to please the reader? What happens when you write to please yourself?
  2. FUBAR Feedback: Why does working with others sometimes help and sometimes hinder the creative process?
  3. Memoir as Prostitution: It can be really awkward writing about yourself and the people you know.
  4. Why Our Stories Matter: We all make meaning by turning our life events into narratives about who we ARE – so we need to be aware of the “spin” factor!
  5. Cleverness and Wordplay (a.k.a. Formal Experimentation and Literary Devices): Might these tricks be sleight-of-hand, a way of distracting ourselves & others from what's really going on?
  6. How to Make Lemonade out of Lemons: Our most difficult moments can provide us with the juiciest material!
  7. In Defense of the Blog: Why I like writing in this format, in this forum.
  8. No More Excuses: Anything, anything at all can be used as an excuse NOT to create – which is why an act of creation is always a leap of faith.

Choose Your Own Adventure


You are reading this because...

A. You are a close friend/relative, and you feel obligated.
B. You thought to yourself, “Life coaching, narrative therapy, and a creative writing class, all rolled into one glitzy, bespangled, ultra mega dazzling three-ring media circus? All that, and more, for FREE?!? Hey, I recognize value when I see it – sign me up!”
C. You typed “peach melba toejam poisoning symptoms” into a search engine, and this is what came up.

I am writing this because...

A. I am a poseur and a hack who has thus far failed to get her brilliant essays and her nuanced, carefully-crafted poetry into The Anytown Review or Bones: A Literary Exhumation.
B. Having devoted my entire adult life to taking writing workshops, editing the writing of others, and teaching composition classes, I have finally fallen down the recursive rabbit hole: writing about writing.
C. I'm at such loose ends that I, a dyed-in-the-wool “Stars Are for Sheep” astrological atheist, have resorted to reading Rob Brezsny's Free Will Astrology column. It appears on Wednesdays in the Willamette Weekly, and this is the advice I got for the week of July 21, 2011: “Fill in the blanks, Taurus....Just fill in the freaking blanks with whatever you've got to fill them with – with your best guesses, with borrowed mojo, with any miscellaneous material you have at hand.” Y'know how there's that song, Walking in Memphis, where the guy sings, “She said, Tell me are you a Christian, child? And I said, Ma'am I am tonight”? Well, that's kind of how it was.

This blog...

A. Is part of a top-secret experiment currently being conducted on everyone. You haven't realized it yet, but a steady diet of other people's search-engine-optimized navel fluff is going to make your head explode. We – that is, an elite corps of specially trained textual analysts – will then carefully examine the spatters you have 'written' on the wall.
B. May contain (in no particular order): writing exercises designed to clear up longstanding confusions, revivify your creative spirits, and motivate you to get moving on what really matters to you; blatant cribbing from other self-help gurus, writing experts (both certified and certifiable), and as-yet-unnamed sources I will attempt to give some kind of cursory nod to; lots of three-item lists and occasional disregard for sacred grammatical rules; self-conscious, possibly inept attempts to shake things up a little by varying the expected pattern; moments of Zen-like calm in which you stare at the silence and wait patiently for me to come up with my next brilliant tidbit – without, of course, any attachment to outcome on your part; grandiose claims, sweeping generalizations, and cliches wearing lychee-flavored underwear; unsolicited advice; a lot of potentially embarrassing information about the author and her imperfect process; pits.
C. Will make you laugh. Will make you cry. Will be better than Cats.
D. All of the above.